Origin of the Universe

 The easiest way to shoot down the naturalistic evolution of the universe is to bring up the Second LAW of Thermodynamics. Note the emphasis on the word 'law' and that we learned on the Science, Uniformity, and Causality page that a Natural Law is as close to a Scientific Fact that we can get so if a Model violates a Law then the model should be thrown out. Whatever brought the universe into existence is no longer in operation because no new energy is currently being created (First Law of Thermodynamics). The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that in a closed system energy is changing into a form that is less usable than its original state (chemical energy to heat and light energy). That would mean if you went far back enough all the energy in the universe would have been in its highest, most usable state. This point would be the beginning of the universe. 

The Second Law can not be overcome by adding energy on this scale because the universe is a closed system.

 

If there is no God then the universe will wind up in a state where all the energy will be in an unusable state. There are two models for the expansion of the universe, either it will expand until everything runs down, or it will expand and then contract and come together again. There are a few problems with the expanding then contracting system such as the universe is not dense enough to pull its self back together again, there is no known law of physics to cause such a pull to make them come back together, and it could not happen an infinite number of times because you can not have an infinite number of finite events. If the universe did expand and contract then you could view it like a bouncing ball where each time it bounces the ball only goes about half the distance until there is a time where it is no longer bouncing. Because of all this we have to view the universe as a closed system and therefore there that means there had to be a beginning.

 When the big bang theory originated they originally guessed that the size of the mass that exploded was several light years in diameter. Now they are saying that the big bang originated from "A point of dimensionless space". What is a point of dimensionless space? They are very careful to not say that 'nothing' exploded and caused everything because they know that nothing can do nothing, and nothing can come from nothing. So how is this "point" in space contain all the energy in its most useful form? The universe had to have a beginning so what was here before the big bang? Where did all the 92 naturally occurring elements come from since the big bang was only supposed to produce hydrogen? If there was a explosion and blew all the mass away it should be evenly distributed however it is not, there are large chunks of mass called galaxies and then gigantic voids. How did these gases decide to get together and form the stars since Boyle's Gas Law (Note: Another LAW) proves that gases can not come together and collapse to form a star?

 How many stars do we see form every year? The Horse Head Nebula and Orion Nebula have often been called star nurseries because it is believed that the dust floating around in the nebula will collapse with some form of circumstellar disc and get pulled to the center to form a star. This process is supposed to take around 100,000 years to get the initial star formed and then over the next 10 million years to 25 million years the dust cloud either gets pulled in or dissipates and a normal star is what remains. So, back to the question of how many stars do we see form in a year, the answer would be zero. We have never seen a star form, we have seen spots getting brighter but we have never seen a star form.

 It has been estimated that there are about 100 billion galaxies in the universe. Each of these galaxies have about 200 billion stars in them for a total of 20 trillion stars in the universe. On an evolutionary time scale the universe is believed to be 20 billion years old. That would mean that 1 trillion stars would have to form every year, or 31,700 would have to form every second. Every day we can use telescopes to see more and more of the known universe and still see that there are more galaxies out there then ever seen before. How can we have not seen even one star form if there are supposed to be 31,700 forming every second?

- 100,000,000,000 galaxies (one hundred billion)
- 200,000,000,000 stars per galaxy (two hundred billion)
- 20,000,000,000,000 stars total (twenty trillion)
- 20,000,000,000 year old universe (twenty billion)
- 31,700 stars formed every second (thirty one thousand seven hundred)

 Nebular 'Theory' (that is not actually a theory) is the best suggestion on how a star could have formed. It is said that our star, the sun, was formed by a large gas cloud that was hit by a blast from a neighboring supernova and caused it to compress to start swirling. This supposedly would cause the cloud to start to collapse under its own gravity and form a star.

- Where did the original supernova star come from?
- How did it compress the gas since it was in a frictionless environment?
- Why wouldn't gravity do it all by itself?

 Gravity is one of the weakest forces in nature. You can easily supersede gravity every time you stand up or pick something up. It is well known that a cloud of gas has so little mass that it has almost no gravity and therefore it is impossible to collapse under it's own power. Another problem is that when it's gravity does start to make it collapse heat is formed. While this may seem logical since it is going to explode to form a star, the problem is that heat causes gas to expand. It has been observed in gas nebula that these large clouds that were thought to be condensing to form stars were actually expanding because of their own heat. Stars can not form under any known natural process.